In an age where diversity and choice reign supreme, the recent report by the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA) highlights an irony in the Commonwealth’s procurement approach. The analogy of ‘AusTinder’ – as coined by Julian Hill MP – is fitting. Just as in the realm of dating apps, where continuously swiping left could mean missing out on a perfect match, the Commonwealth’s procurement procedures seem to favour the familiar ‘profile pictures’ of major consulting firms, sidelining smaller players who could offer a refreshing, cost-effective and innovative approach.
The spotlight shining predominantly on big names like Accenture, KPMG, Ernst & Young, PWC, and Deloitte points to a pattern of selecting familiar faces, even when the extensive panels present a plethora of options.
Federal and state government secure panels of consulting firms. The idea is to share the work among them. These panels are designed to provide a comprehensive range of professional advisory services from commercial and financial advice to tax advisory and probity advice, the panel offers:
Yet the consistent ‘swiping left’ on SMEs, despite their potential for delivering value, innovation and specialised services, raises questions about the effectiveness of the current procurement strategy. Indeed, it should make all businesses reflect on their own strategies, and whether they incorporate enough SMEs in their supply chains.
Our experience suggests there is still a long way to go, in the public sector and private. Let’s take a look at why SMEs are so valuable as vendors, and how to increase their participation.
Administrative fees and managerial costs at big firms, like the ones the government seems so wedded to, can be astronomical. These are typically much lower at small to medium enterprises. Obviously it depends on the type of procurement being conducted, but this fact alone can make SMEs far more valuable.
On a broader level, the more suppliers involved and the greater their range in size and capability, the more competition there is. And as we know, nothing creates downward pressure on prices quite like healthy competition.
SMEs wield a unique agility owing to their concise management hierarchies and speedy decision-making processes. This nimbleness allows them to swiftly adapt to evolving market demands, a trait that sets them apart.
Often laser-focused on specific markets, SMEs exhibit a remarkable responsiveness to the ever-changing dynamics within those niches. Their ability to pivot swiftly is a testament to their adaptability and market acumen.
For larger entities that choose to use SMEs, a compelling dynamic unfolds. These SMEs recognise the significance of their big clients and, as a result, provide a higher and more personalised level of service, nurturing robust client-supplier relationships.
They also often shine in their capacity to tailor their products or services to precisely meet the unique needs of their customers—a feat that larger, more rigid corporations may struggle to replicate.
Notably, many SMEs excel in delivering top-notch, specialised products or services, a feat often driven by their unwavering commitment and expertise in their chosen fields. This commitment frequently results in the provision of higher-quality offerings compared to their larger counterparts.
SMEs serve as catalysts for innovation on multiple fronts. They lead the charge in embracing cutting-edge technologies, champion sustainable practices and alternatives, explore uncharted markets and wield innovation as a powerful tool to distinguish themselves from entrenched industry giants.
Set-asides in government procurement entail the reservation or earmarking of specific contracts for particular types of businesses. These businesses may include Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander enterprises, social enterprises and more. In essence, only those businesses meeting the defined criteria within the set-aside category will be initially invited to submit quotes or tenders for these contracts.
Review and revise procurement policies and regulations to make them more accessible and favorable to SMEs. This may include simplifying procurement processes, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and ensuring fair competition.
Organise workshops, webinars, and training sessions to educate SMEs about the procurement process, including bidding, compliance and quality standards. Create programs to help SMEs improve their capabilities, such as mentoring, technical assistance and access to financing. These programs can enhance their ability to meet procurement requirements.
Streamline the procurement process for smaller contracts to reduce administrative burdens on SMEs. This includes simplifying documentation and evaluation criteria.
Implement policies to ensure prompt payment to SME suppliers, and make it known that this is how you operate. Delayed payments can be a significant challenge for smaller businesses, so they’ll be far more likely to bid for contracts with you if they believe prompt payment is a priority.
SMEs won’t be appropriate at all points in your supply chain. Conduct market research to identify opportunities where they can add value. Tailor procurement strategies to align with SME capabilities.
Establish feedback channels to gather input from SMEs on their experiences with the procurement process. Use this feedback to make continuous improvements.
When it comes to engaging SMEs, you won’t find better guidance than that provided by us. As an SME ourselves, we know what businesses like us think, what their concerns are, their realities, and how best to work with them. To take advantage of all the unique benefits SMEs present, get in touch with the team at
Comprara today.